Customereye

SGS Engineering

Construction & Industrial • United Kingdomwww.sgs-engineering.com

Review data last updated .

Based on public reviews and response behavior.

Tip: Tap or click the ⓘ icons to learn how to read each section. Expand cards for evidence.

Overall Score

48/100
−7.3 vs. last month4.49 ★ average rating · 600 reviews

Competitive Performance Rank

Among fully-analyzed Construction & Industrial companies

#321of 404
Top 79% · Bottom Tier
#1 (best)#404 (worst)
#319Peer
#320Peer
#321This company
#322Peer
#323Peer

Overall Customer Sentiment

Below Average

75% of reviews positive, 24% negative

75%
positive
  • Positive75%
  • Neutral1%
  • Negative24%

Sentiment Balance

Covering November 2024 — 9 reviews, not the company's full review history.

positive
  • Positive
  • Neutral
  • Negative

Takeaway: Positive sentiment accounts for 33% of reviews in this period, with 67% negative and 0% neutral.

Sentiment Trend Over Time

Reviews (Count)

Showing 600 reviews across the months with enough data to chart reliably (min 3/month), most recent: November 2024.

Sentiment has been declining over the period shown.

Theme Distribution

Share of theme mentions

Delivery Shipping
19.1%
Product Quality
17.0%
Customer Support
14.6%
Response Speed
13.8%
Pricing
11.3%

Most feedback concerns Delivery Shipping.

The most common complaint theme is Communication, making up 4.5% of all theme mentions.

Churn Signal Score

Rule-based: negative-review share, churn-intent phrases, and sentiment movement over time.

HIGH63/100
63/100
signal score
  • Built from a negative-review share of 42.3% across this company's analyzed reviews.
  • 3 reviews contain phrases that signal intent to leave, such as cancelling or switching provider.
  • Recent reviews are more negative than earlier ones, which pushes the signal up.

Reviewer Breakdown

Star split and recent-versus-earlier sentiment.

4.5avg rating
5
81.8%
4
5.3%
3
1.8%
2
1.8%
1
9.2%

Based on 600 analyzed reviews. Sentiment is slipping: 42.1% of reviews in the last three months were positive, compared with 90.0% in the three months before that.

Unlock full insights

Sign up to view detailed data and analysis