Nutritionforlongevity

Food & Beverage • United Statesnutritionforlongevity.com

Review data last updated August 10, 2026.

Request Custom AnalysisSign up free to see everything

Based on public reviews and response behavior.

Overall Score

48/100

3.76 ★ average rating · 600 reviews

Competitive Performance Rank

Among fully-analyzed Food & Beverage companies

#451of 551

Top 82% · Bottom Tier

#1 (best)#551 (worst)

#449Peer

#450Peer

#451This company

#452Peer

#453Peer

Overall Customer Sentiment

Below Average

71% of reviews positive, 27% negative

71%

positive

Positive71%
Neutral2%
Negative27%

Sentiment Balance

Covering October 2022 — 3 reviews, not the company's full review history.

Positive sentiment

Neutral sentiment

Negative sentiment

—

positive

Positive—
Neutral—
Negative—

Takeaway: Positive sentiment accounts for 0% of reviews in this period, with 100% negative and 0% neutral.

Sentiment Trend Over Time

Reviews (Count)

Showing 579 reviews across the months with enough data to chart reliably (min 3/month), most recent: October 2022.

Sentiment has been declining over the period shown.

Theme Distribution

Share of theme mentions

Delivery Shipping

20.0%

Product Quality

19.2%

Customer Support

16.7%

Loyalty

10.2%

Response Speed

8.7%

Most feedback concerns Delivery Shipping.

The most common complaint theme is Communication, making up 3.7% of all theme mentions.

Churn Signal Score

Rule-based: negative-review share, churn-intent phrases, and sentiment movement over time.

HIGH57/100

57/100

signal score

•Built from a negative-review share of 31.7% across this company's analyzed reviews.
•5 reviews contain phrases that signal intent to leave, such as cancelling or switching provider.
•Recent reviews are more negative than earlier ones, which pushes the signal up.

Reviewer Breakdown

Star split and recent-versus-earlier sentiment.

3.8avg rating

5★

47.3%

4★

15.7%

3★

14.5%

2★

10.8%

1★

11.7%

Based on 600 analyzed reviews. Sentiment is slipping: 0.0% of reviews in the last three months were positive, compared with 40.0% in the three months before that.

Unlock full insights