Customereye

RTS Financial

Lending & Consumer Finance • United Stateswww.rtsinc.com

Review data last updated .

Based on public reviews and response behavior.

Tip: Tap or click the ⓘ icons to learn how to read each section. Expand cards for evidence.

Overall Score

48/100
−19.2 vs. last month4.10 ★ average rating · 600 reviews

Competitive Performance Rank

Among fully-analyzed Lending & Consumer Finance companies

#236of 275
Top 86% · Bottom Tier
#1 (best)#275 (worst)
#234Peer
#235Peer
#236This company
#237Peer
#238Peer

Overall Customer Sentiment

Below Average

74% of reviews positive, 24% negative

74%
positive
  • Positive74%
  • Neutral2%
  • Negative24%

Sentiment Balance

Covering October 2024 — 13 reviews, not the company's full review history.

positive
  • Positive
  • Neutral
  • Negative

Takeaway: Positive sentiment accounts for 31% of reviews in this period, with 69% negative and 0% neutral.

Sentiment Trend Over Time

Reviews (Count)

Showing 600 reviews across the months with enough data to chart reliably (min 3/month), most recent: October 2024.

Sentiment has been declining over the period shown.

Theme Distribution

Share of theme mentions

Customer Support
29.4%
Product Quality
14.7%
Loyalty
13.2%
Problem Resolution
10.2%
Onboarding
7.8%

Most feedback concerns Customer Support.

The most common complaint theme is Pricing, making up 6.9% of all theme mentions.

Churn Signal Score

Rule-based: negative-review share, churn-intent phrases, and sentiment movement over time.

HIGH49/100
49/100
signal score
  • Built from a negative-review share of 35.0% across this company's analyzed reviews.
  • 7 reviews contain phrases that signal intent to leave, such as cancelling or switching provider.
  • The share of negative reviews has held steady over time, so the trend doesn't move the score.

Reviewer Breakdown

Star split and recent-versus-earlier sentiment.

4.1avg rating
5
74.3%
4
3.2%
3
0.8%
2
1.5%
1
20.2%

Based on 600 analyzed reviews. Sentiment is holding steady: 54.1% of reviews in the last three months were positive, compared with 57.4% in the three months before that.

Unlock full insights

Sign up to view detailed data and analysis