Pittman & Davis

Food & Dining • United Stateswww.pittmandavis.com

Review data last updated August 10, 2026.

Request Custom AnalysisSign up free to see everything

Based on public reviews and response behavior.

Overall Score

65/100

−3.6 vs. last month4.50 ★ average rating · 600 reviews

Competitive Performance Rank

Among fully-analyzed Food & Dining companies

#12of 71

Top 17% · Top Tier

#1 (best)#71 (worst)

#10Peer

#11Peer

#12This company

#13Peer

#14Peer

Overall Customer Sentiment

Category Leader

77% of reviews positive, 21% negative

77%

positive

Positive77%
Neutral3%
Negative21%

Sentiment Balance

Covering October 2024 — 69 reviews, not the company's full review history.

Positive sentiment

Neutral sentiment

Negative sentiment

—

positive

Positive—
Neutral—
Negative—

Takeaway: Positive sentiment accounts for 75% of reviews in this period, with 25% negative and 0% neutral.

Sentiment Trend Over Time

Reviews (Count)

Showing 600 reviews across the months with enough data to chart reliably (min 3/month), most recent: October 2024.

Sentiment has been improving over the period shown.

Theme Distribution

Share of theme mentions

Delivery Shipping

29.5%

Onboarding

18.1%

Product Quality

12.1%

Customer Support

10.2%

Loyalty

9.3%

Most feedback concerns Delivery Shipping.

The most common complaint theme is Communication, making up 3.8% of all theme mentions.

Churn Signal Score

Rule-based: negative-review share, churn-intent phrases, and sentiment movement over time.

MEDIUM32/100

32/100

signal score

•Built from a negative-review share of 36.0% across this company's analyzed reviews.
•3 reviews contain phrases that signal intent to leave, such as cancelling or switching provider.
•Recent reviews are less negative than earlier ones, which pulls the signal down.

Reviewer Breakdown

Star split and recent-versus-earlier sentiment.

4.5avg rating

5★

75.0%

4★

12.7%

3★

4.8%

2★

2.3%

1★

5.2%

Based on 600 analyzed reviews. Sentiment is improving: 96.8% of reviews in the last three months were positive, compared with 88.6% in the three months before that.

Unlock full insights