Aaptiv

Supplements & Nutrition • United Statesaaptiv.com

Review data last updated August 16, 2026.

Request Custom AnalysisSign up free to see everything

Based on public reviews and response behavior.

Overall Score

48/100

+15.8 vs. last month3.31 ★ average rating · 1,795 reviews

Competitive Performance Rank

Among fully-analyzed Supplements & Nutrition companies

#264of 301

Top 88% · Bottom Tier

#1 (best)#301 (worst)

#262Peer

#263Peer

#264This company

#265Peer

#266Peer

Overall Customer Sentiment

Below Average

64% of reviews positive, 34% negative

64%

positive

Positive64%
Neutral2%
Negative34%

Sentiment Balance

Covering August 2026 — 9 reviews, not the company's full review history.

Positive sentiment

Neutral sentiment

Negative sentiment

—

positive

Positive—
Neutral—
Negative—

Takeaway: Positive sentiment accounts for 44% of reviews in this period, with 56% negative and 0% neutral.

Sentiment Trend Over Time

Reviews (Count)

Showing 1,783 reviews across the months with enough data to chart reliably (min 3/month), most recent: August 2026.

Sentiment has been declining over the period shown.

Theme Distribution

Share of theme mentions

Product Quality

20.9%

Loyalty

17.3%

Pricing

16.4%

Customer Support

12.1%

Communication

9.5%

Most feedback concerns Product Quality.

The most common complaint theme is Communication, making up 9.5% of all theme mentions.

Churn Signal Score

Rule-based: negative-review share, churn-intent phrases, and sentiment movement over time.

HIGH69/100

69/100

signal score

•Built from a negative-review share of 33.9% across this company's analyzed reviews.
•32 reviews contain phrases that signal intent to leave, such as cancelling or switching provider.
•Recent reviews are more negative than earlier ones, which pushes the signal up.

Reviewer Breakdown

Star split and recent-versus-earlier sentiment.

3.3avg rating

5★

45.7%

4★

8.2%

3★

8.1%

2★

7.3%

1★

30.7%

Based on 1,795 analyzed reviews. Sentiment is slipping: 36.4% of reviews in the last three months were positive, compared with 50.0% in the three months before that.

Unlock full insights