Customereye

University Living

Real Estate & Property • United Kingdomuniversityliving.com

Review data last updated .

Based on public reviews and response behavior.

Tip: Tap or click the ⓘ icons to learn how to read each section. Expand cards for evidence.

Overall Score

69/100
+2.9 vs. last month4.53 ★ average rating · 605 reviews

Competitive Performance Rank

Among fully-analyzed Real Estate & Property companies

#12of 92
Top 13% · Top Tier
#1 (best)#92 (worst)
#10Peer
#11Peer
#12This company
#13Peer
#14Peer

Overall Customer Sentiment

Category Leader

85% of reviews positive, 14% negative

85%
positive
  • Positive85%
  • Neutral1%
  • Negative14%

Sentiment Balance

Covering November 2024 — 39 reviews, not the company's full review history.

positive
  • Positive
  • Neutral
  • Negative

Takeaway: Positive sentiment accounts for 92% of reviews in this period, with 8% negative and 0% neutral.

Sentiment Trend Over Time

Reviews (Count)

Showing 601 reviews across the months with enough data to chart reliably (min 3/month), most recent: November 2024.

Sentiment has been holding steady over the period shown.

Theme Distribution

Share of theme mentions

Customer Support
33.8%
Product Quality
13.5%
Onboarding
13.3%
Loyalty
11.7%
Response Speed
8.3%

Most feedback concerns Customer Support.

The most common complaint theme is Pricing, making up 5.9% of all theme mentions.

Churn Signal Score

Rule-based: negative-review share, churn-intent phrases, and sentiment movement over time.

LOW18/100
18/100
signal score
  • Built from a negative-review share of 14.2% across this company's analyzed reviews.
  • 2 reviews contain phrases that signal intent to leave, such as cancelling or switching provider.
  • The share of negative reviews has held steady over time, so the trend doesn't move the score.

Reviewer Breakdown

Star split and recent-versus-earlier sentiment.

4.5avg rating
5
78.3%
4
12.1%
3
1.2%
2
0.8%
1
7.6%

Based on 605 analyzed reviews. Sentiment is holding steady: 87.8% of reviews in the last three months were positive, compared with 92.1% in the three months before that.

Unlock full insights

Sign up to view detailed data and analysis